Who can see your viewing activity?
Hi Fellows! Happy to see many of you here this morning! If you have questions, please feel free to type your questions in the chat.
Yes, Vicki stated my implied question accurately.
In Eisenhower’s case, there is also a back story of corporate interests pushing “Christian Nation” memes as a way to weaken remnants of the New Deal.
an West Point and Tulsa seem different in that one is voluntary. People decide, with free will, to go to Tulsa including signing waivers. West Point was compulsory using the power of the presidency.
`Leopold II removed in Amsterdam or Brussels? He was Belgian......
Keep typing your questions everyone!
Efforts to unscramble Trump’s violations of the Emoluments Clause seem to be at a low ebb. In his reelection campaign, he’ll use the Boeing 747 Air Force One extensively. Are there remedies? Requirements that the campaign reimburse the Air Force, for example?
And Trump is apparently seeking federal financial support for his golf courses during this economic downturn......
I don't think we can say the SpCt decided "in favor of the Dreamers." The decision, yet unread, seems to have focused on a procedural matter.
But is the court now going to zig to the right on Roe v. Wade and the Affordable Care Act?
I've got to run everyone, thank you CIR for the intriguing and informative talk! I'll be sure to tune in again
Thanks Arielle!!! Until the next
Obama just came out with praise for the Supreme Court
Would any of the panel consider the stay of lower court challenges to trump ignoring the intent of Congress to limit funds to build the infamous wall -particularly egregious as the Constitution is clear about the right of Congress to allocate funds. Trump just decided he didn't need to accept the will of Congress and the SC seems to have agreed with him.