
05:51
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MyDayX3H0uatwW76PeXjT-YMBPHkWqQexTL8N0QY0_0/edit

09:40
Rick, here is the doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MyDayX3H0uatwW76PeXjT-YMBPHkWqQexTL8N0QY0_0/edit

09:47
Agree, fragmentation is bad.

09:59
Agree, fragmentation is bad.

10:11
I am in agreement that fragmentation is bad

10:12
Fragmentation=bad

21:49
I like when we can give an example that people can grasp that rather than an existential argument.

27:03
We can also think about taking Steve’s example up a few k feet, is there a data aggregation issue?

38:12
splinternet

46:15
That’s why we’ll slate this before cocktails ;)

49:10
Successful digital sovereignty is the end of multistakeholder governance and that is a big scary threat.

50:04
This cries out for us to use Scenarios, demonstrating a fragmented world in 5 years and 10 years

50:44
Trump blocked TikTok for political purposes to show he was tough on China.

50:54
It really wasnt to protect Americans

52:06
MY view is that TikTok is harmful to the Americans

55:29
And then those scenarios give us a chance to discuss th”should” that Steve mentioned - how we address this without/before fragmentation.

57:32
+1 lets articulate a goal as informing ‘regulators’ on current threats to fragmentation that the US can help mitigate

57:35
Something like that?

59:23
In the “pessimistic” scenario would be about many forms of fragmentation, incl those with motives that are cultural, economic, national security, child protection, etc.

01:00:15
They’re all lumped into a plausible scenario, that paints a frightening picture. It’s “America First” on steroids and in every country

01:02:06
I have to drop for another call. This has been a good discussion. Look forward to the next meeting.

01:03:57
Lots to consider. To me it's a mater of balance and security. Appreciate being a part. Humbling. Thanks everyone.