Zoom Logo

AB 32 Environmental Justice Advisory Committee Meeting - Shared screen with speaker view
Rich Parenteau
01:06:50
Hi, I would like to discuss reducing transportation emissions to improve EJ.
Rich Parenteau
01:08:02
Specifically commercial vehicles like medium and heavy trucks
INTERPRETE Reyna Rodriguez, Linguistica
01:09:00
Si le gustaría escuchar la junta en español, tenemos traducción disponible por medio de la plataforma de Zoom. Seleccione el Icono que parece un mundo y entonces podrá unirse al lenguaje de español (Spanish). Puede hacer comentarios y preguntas en su idioma de preferencia.
INTERPRETE Reyna Rodriguez, Linguistica
01:09:34
Simultaneous interpreting will be available throughout the meeting. If you are monolingual English Only, you will need to select the interpretation icon and select English. You will not be able to hear Spanish to English unless you are in a channel.
Rey León
01:10:31
gracias!
Yvonne Martinez Watson (She/Her)
01:22:38
Thank you Dillon!
Dillon Delvo - EJAC
01:23:53
Sorry, I forgot to mention my pronouns are he/him.
Ariel Ambruster - Facilitator, CCP
01:24:52
Thanks, Dillon!
Andrew Meredith
01:27:06
On behalf of the State Building & Construction Trades Council of California, we’d like to thank CARB Board Members for their clear direction regarding the inclusion of a Labor representative on the EJAC. We strongly believe the voice of Labor is a crucial component of developing the Scoping Plan. With nearly half a million members throughout the state, including roughly 70,000 registered apprentices, the health of our communities is a tremendous issue for our organization. Over 70% of our apprentices identify as people of color, so we are truly sympathetic to the impacts of climate change on communities of color. We are hopeful that the new EJAC members will embrace the inclusion of Labor’s voice on this committee, as it will truly provide an important perspective to this discussion.
Rich Parenteau
01:29:02
Welcome Andrew Meredith, Trades are important to getting the carbon out :-)
Kevin Hamilton, RRT (he, him, his)
01:35:58
Kevin Hamilton from CCAC has joined the meeting.
Ariel Ambruster - Facilitator, CCP
01:36:21
Welcome Kevin! We'll turn to you after Paulina Torres.
Rey León - EJAC
01:43:14
Forgot to mention that I am Executive Director of The LEAP Institute. theleapinstitute.org :)
Andrew Meredith
01:43:43
Thank you, Ray
Rey León - EJAC
01:43:57
The value of squeaky wheel is that it gets attention! :)
Thomas Helme - EJAC
01:52:38
Sorry I forgot- he/him/his
Ariel Ambruster - Facilitator, CCP (she/her)
01:53:55
Thanks., Tom!
Neena (they/she) - CEJA - EJAC
02:02:24
Thanks Mari Rose!
Veronica Eady (she/her)
02:04:07
Thank you Chanell!!!
Christal Lazard-CARB
02:04:21
yay Veronica!!
Veronica Eady (she/her)
02:04:46
Thank you Chanell!! That's so sweet. I have your back, and EJAC's as well. Call on me for anything!
Jennifer Dhillon
02:07:38
My name is Jennifer Dhillon and I’m a former EJ attorney who now works in low income, and historically oppressed communities addressing the effects of trauma and building resilience (Bounce Back Generation). In working with our communities there are several issues that have come up that are EJ issues and I have noted how difficult it is for members of our communities to focus on environmental issues because of the trauma they are consistently addressing. I see how trauma affects public participation, and how it is not considered as an essential cause of some of the historical trauma (e.g. a public housing resident living near polluting industries is now dealing with asthma for themselves, their child, which creates a host of barriers to participation). I have been out of the loop in the EJ world so I don’t know how historical, generational, systemic trauma is being considered as a factor to be addressed, mitigated, or repaired (reparations). I’d love to share in any way possible in this conversation. Thanks.
Rey León - EJAC
02:09:26
Thanks for sharing Jennifer!
Jennifer Dhillon
02:10:32
Thank you, Rey!
Yvonne Martinez Watson (She/Her)
02:10:54
YES! Thank you Chanell for naming the truth of environmental racism in environmental justice!
Connie Cho - EJAC
02:10:57
Thank you so much for naming that environmental justice is about addressing environmental racism!
Kim Springer - C/CAG
02:12:18
There is a real issue with data privacy and access to data to understand program outcomes to help our communities. Californians use electricity, natural gas, water, but those resources aren't generated, drilled for or fracked, or don't fall, respectively, on the sites these resources are used. Why is customer use of these shared resources, generated from sites where communities are exposed to the emissions, private at all? Data access, especially for energy, because of the State's 15/15 rules, has gotten so bad that cites can't even develop GHG emission inventories. Is there a kinship in the EJ community on this issue? I'm interested in your feedback on this issue. You can email me at kspringer@smcgov.org.
Hector De La Torre
02:20:13
Ellen,When will the decision be made on stipend
Yvonne Martinez Watson (She/Her)
02:29:20
Will the presentation be available to view after this meeting?
Trish Johnson
02:29:49
The presentation is available here: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ab-32-environmental-justice-advisory-committee-meeting-june-4-2021
Gary Hughes - Biofuelwatch
02:29:56
Our organization Biofuelwatch requests that the EJAC is supported to take a hard look at the assumptions in the entire frame of ‘carbon neutrality.’ Carbon neutrality targets are often not as ambitious as they sound, relying on problematic carbon offsets and unproven and dangerous technologies — 10 myths about net zero targets and carbon offsetting, busted — https://www.climatechangenews.com/2020/12/11/10-myths-net-zero-targets-carbon-offsetting-busted/
Sandra Berg
02:30:59
Thank you for your direction, great introductions and discussion. I look forward to participating. I’m signing off. Have a great weekend. Sandy Berg
Rich Parenteau
02:31:01
What meeting(s) can I participate in to advocate foradding to the scoping plan an imitative for reducing transportation emissions to improve EJ ? Specifically building zero emission infrastructure for commercial vehicles like medium and heavy trucks fRichard Parenteauadvocate@no-carbon.net
Martha Dina Arguello- PSR-LA - EJAC
02:35:30
While there is nothing in writing I would imagine date is being looked at, models are being used and this is key information for EJAC to have now
Connie Cho - EJAC
02:38:01
I echo that concern about the workshops, Paulina!
Amy D Kyle
02:45:40
One point I would add to this discussion is that there are aspects of the technical work that have created barriers to considering EJ and equity in past scoping plans. This includes both aspects of the models and aspects of data that are being used and how well they represent conditions in EJ communities. Some of this is structural and may need to be changed or supplemented with different approaches.
Matt Holmes (he/him/his) Little Manila Rising
02:50:47
+++ Amy D. Kyle There's no reliably granular data in anyone's plan to accurately describe pollution in the Northern San Joaquin Valley..... Outside of the mortality data.
Kevin Hamilton, RRT (he, him, his) - EJAC
02:50:49
Well said Amy.
Connie Cho - EJAC
02:53:24
(Is this chat a part of the record? Just on behalf of the commenters, maybe we should clarify.)
Dan
02:54:01
They said that at the beginning I believe
Connie Cho - EJAC
02:54:13
(Thank you Dan, I apologize that I missed that detail!)
Ariel Ambruster - Facilitator, CCP (she/her)
02:55:13
Connie, thanks for asking that clarifying question. CARB EJ staff will be reviewing the comments carefully, so yes the chat will be downloaded and reviewed, if that meets your definition of "the record."
Patrisha (Pat) Piras
02:56:23
Connie & All — Anyone can “save” the Chat for themselves, by clicking on the 3 little dots at the bottom, to the right of the “File” icon.
Ariel Ambruster - Facilitator, CCP (she/her)
02:58:45
Thanks Pat for that helpful info for folks.
Rich Parenteau
03:03:33
Kevin's comments are on the mark, The Scoping Plan needs to plan actual "on the ground" actions and describe the specific timing of pollution improvements in the impacted locations. Carbon off-sets are helpful overall, but do not seem to make a difference in the specific EJ areas. ZEV and related infrastructure need to happen in the EJ areas as a priority.
Rich Parenteau
03:08:52
Chanel is correct to conclude that EJAC needs to move faster in order to be a player in next week's meetings and beyond. Move faster and don't spin the wheels.
Yvonne Martinez Watson (She/Her)
03:08:54
For the record, please add the explanation of ISD into the chat for people who are having troubling hearing the presentation.
Jonathan Pruitt (Catholic Charities)
03:10:56
Thank you Yvonne for highlighting that
Trish Johnson
03:10:59
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/organization-industrial-strategies-division
Catherine Garoupa White, they/she - EJAC
03:11:42
ISD = Industrial Strategies Division
Jim Kennedy, E.D., Healthy Air Alliance
03:12:04
@NeenaMohan-CEJA: I would like to echo her last points about reframing the approach and lead with equity. All the goals referenced today are in the distant future: 2030, 2045, and beyond. The studies done to meet these goals start from those dates and reverse engineer solutions. These models have the potential of not putting enough importance on the health benefits of doing more sooner. My hope is that EJAC actions start today and go forward. Looking at what is possible every day to maximize toxic air pollution reductions that have been having disproportional health impacts. This scoping plan should be about what is now technologically feasible to protect health. Thanks! Jim Kennedy, Healthy Air Alliance, Jim@healthyairalliance.org
Connie Cho - EJAC
03:12:48
Please let us know if it would be helpful to suggest EJ experts that we could recommend to be a part of each workshop next week to integrate EJ rather than silo-ing it? Of course, contingent on the availability of our colleagues.
Chanell Fletcher
03:13:18
Yes that would be helpful Connie!
Ariel Ambruster - Facilitator, CCP (she/her)
03:16:58
Jim, thanks for sharing your concerns and priorities, and underlining Neena's thoughts.
Amy D Kyle
03:19:36
Ariel I will yield my slot since you are running out of time but would just say that I think major models are already completed. EMFAC was published in April for example. I am not aware of any plan to devise an equity based model to use as a counter point to the economic model but might be worth posing. Also a meta discussion of what the decision criteria for selecting strategies for the scoping plan seems like it would be something to address right away so that any foundational work to support that could get done.
Neena (they/she) - CEJA - EJAC
03:20:04
+++Amy
Andrew Meredith
03:23:18
Question: the intent of CARB Board Members in creating the ‘Labor’ seat on EJAC seemed to be geared towards providing a voice representing workers in CA. With that in mind, it seems pointless to consider residence address as a requirement
Julia May, CBE, she/they
03:23:18
Conflict of Interest has been a problem in many state committees. CARB needs to ensure that the EJAC is actually made up of EJ.
Martha Dina Arguello- PSR-LA - EJAC
03:24:17
+++paulina
Neena (they/she) - CEJA - EJAC
03:24:39
Yes Paulina! The EJAC is meant to be comprised of EJ- not other general constituencies.
Sharifa Taylor (she/they) EJAC
03:24:50
Agreed Paulina. Thanks for uplifting this concern.
Andrew Meredith
03:24:50
CARB directed the addition of a Labor seat. EJAC doesn’t seem to have the ability to deviate from that directive.
Matt Holmes (he/him/his) Little Manila Rising
03:24:58
+++ Paulina. Until labor supports the just transition strategies that will increase labor security we have to confront the history of subverting long term public health strategies in favor of short term earnings.
Dillon Delvo - EJAC
03:25:03
Thanks Paulina
Julia May, CBE, she/they
03:26:27
+++Paulina. Also, CARB Board did not suggest that the EJAC should include labor members that are in conflict with AB32 requirements.
Catherine Garoupa White, they/she - EJAC
03:26:31
I share concerns about a “labor” seat on the EJAC as it is currently described. I also want to recognize that “labor” is a broad term and I’m not clear how it’s been used here.
Catherine Garoupa White, they/she - EJAC
03:29:34
Thanks for those details and look forward to future clarifications as the process to add more members moves forward.
Andrew Meredith
03:32:51
The ‘Labor’ seat should be recommended by the California Labor Federation and/or the California Building & Construction Trades Council
luis olmedo
03:33:20
agree with Rey. better articulated.
Patrisha (Pat) Piras
03:35:51
There are A LOT of workers who are not in the building trades!!
Andrew Meredith
03:38:04
Agreed. The California Labor Federation covers ALL unionized workers, not just the Building Trades.
Rich Parenteau
03:38:10
Julia May: Excellent points.
Trish Johnson
03:42:32
CA State EJ definition is section 65040.12e: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=65040.12.
Andrew Meredith
03:42:44
There was clear board direction to create a Labor seat.
Connie Cho - EJAC
03:43:05
Thank you for that emphasis on statutory requirements, Roger. I also appreciate Paulina’s earlier articulation, and agree with her as well as Julia. At CBE, we work with (and support) workers, union members, unions, and coalitions of unions with members in Disadvantaged Communities with the highest pollution burdens that are rooted in environmental justice, but understand that there’s a great deal of difference on environmental issues and certainly environmental justice for DACs within/among unions/coalitions.
Connie Cho - EJAC
03:43:59
Thank you for your diligence, Trish!
CAREY BYLIN
03:44:00
Apologies for the delay: Industrial Strategies Division is the Division within CARB that, among other things, leads the technical development of the Scoping Plan.
Estella Kessler
03:45:50
Why bother increasing the committee if around has to think a like
Andrew Meredith
03:46:15
Very good point Estella
Trish Johnson
03:47:13
chanell.fletcher@arb.ca.gov, trish.johnson@arb.ca.gov
Matt Holmes (he/him/his) Little Manila Rising
03:47:22
Strong work today folks. History never leaves us easy conversations. But this was a good start. Thank you. Chanell & Trish (et. al.) for curating the EJ voices we heard today.
Neena (they/she) - CEJA - EJAC
03:47:37
Thanks everyone!
Catherine Garoupa White, they/she - EJAC
03:47:42
thanks!
Liane Randolph
03:47:45
Thank you everyone!
Paulina Torres - EJAC
03:47:46
Thanks, everyone!
Trish Johnson
03:47:46
Thank you everyone for your time!
Dillon Delvo - EJAC
03:47:49
Thanks!
Dan Woo, CDPH (he/his)
03:47:49
Great job!